Canon ef vs rf lenses reddit

Author: ured

August undefined, 2024

WebIt is the spiritual successor of the EF-S 55-250MM F4-5.6 IS STM and the EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS II USM lenses. If you have tried either of those older lenses and liked them, you will probably like the RF 100-400mm. I own the EF-S 55-250mm, and it may be my favourite lens I have ever owned. WebWhether the lens is EF or EF-S makes NO difference here. Focal length is focal length and field of view is determined by focal length and the physical size of the sensor. All an EF-S lens tells you is that the lens doesn't have reasonable quality outside the cropped sensor of …

Canon RF 100-300mm f/2.8L IS USM next from Canon

WebMost Canon EF lenses should work fine or better on the R6. Some exceptions do exist, impacting AF coverage and / or fps. With 3rd party lenses there is a higher risk of the same issues occurring, especially with older ones that can't be updated - some of them use lens ids that Canon used for lenses that don' t perform well on the R series. WebR5 user with RF / EF lenses here. EF Compatibilty is great. No loss whatsoever. RF glass is more advanced & optimized for new system, tho. You will notice f/2.8 AND Image Stabilizer in RF lenses where the EF counterpart had either 2.8 OR IS (e.g. EF 16-35 f/2.8 OR f/4 IS, same with 24-70, not valid for 70-200). pork allergy treatment

EF vs RF lens construction : r/canon - reddit.com

WebI currently own the EF 100mm f/2.8L IS Macro, EF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS II, TS-E 24mm f/3.5L, TS-E 17mm f/4L, and RF 70-200mm f/4L. I'd say that they all seem to have fairly similar build quality and construction materials. I certainly haven't noticed any dramatic differences when out shooting. WebOptically, the RF50/1.2 and RF85/1.2 L's are worlds better than the EF variants. They are much faster in AF speed and their sharpness when shot wide-open is unreal. Whether that's worth it to you or not, that's up to you to decide, but for someone that values these aspects, it is very much worth it. 19 MintyMarlfox • 3 yr. ago WebAll three have Image Stabilization, including the Canon RF 15-35mm F2.8L IS USM and Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM, where the corresponding EF lenses do not. "And the third lens in the trinity, the Canon RF 70 … pork allergy anticoagulation

What Is The Difference Between Canon RF and EF …

WebNov 23, 2024 · For this purpose these lenses have been compared: Canon RF 50mm 1.2L. Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L. Canon EF 50mm 1.2L. … WebJan 11, 2016 · EF traditionally had both types of zoom operation. All of the big white RF models so far are extending zooms: RF 70-200/2.8 RF 70-200/4 RF 100-500/4.5-7.1 … pork allergy symptoms in adultsWebThe EF lenses will adapt onto the R-series bodies and work the same as—if not better than—on DSLR bodies, so there's definitely nothing wrong with buying a EF version and adapting it, especially considering the price difference between EF and RF. sharp capture

"WebEF lenses are designed for Canon's DSLR cameras, while RF lenses are specifically created for Canon's mirrorless cameras. RF lenses have a larger mount diameter, which allows them to transmit more information between the lens and camera body. This means that RF lenses can offer faster autofocus and better image stabilization. " - Canon ef vs rf lenses reddit

Canon ef vs rf lenses reddit

EF 100-400 II vs. RF 100-500 : r/canon - reddit.com

WebRF 35mm 1.8 vs RF 16mm 2.8? Hey everyone I'm in a debate with myself about these two lens. So I currently have a Canon EOS R with 24-105mm F4 L USM. I want to get the 35mm F1.8 for night, street, Astro, full body portraits with blurry background. It's also on sale at the moment of $300 instead of $400. My dad the other day said he wants to get ...

Did you know?

WebThese include a 24-105 f4 L, 35 f2, 50 f1.8 and 18-135 USM. I love using the 80D/35 f2 as a walk around setup. If I trade in all my crop sensor kit to mpb.com, I should receive … WebCanon and Sony prices are comparable for similar quality but Sony does have far more lower-end lenses, plus third-party lenses. Both systems adapt EF lenses well (use the Sigma MC-11 for Sony). Canon has some unique RF lenses that might push you to them. The 70-200 f2.8 is VERY compact.

WebIn the image quality comparison equalized at f/4, the two lenses are similar overall, with each having some advantages at specific focal lengths. The f/4 lens has stronger geometric distortion and has stronger lateral CA. The f/2.8 has stronger peripheral shading in most equalized comparisons. WebReddit iOS Reddit Android Reddit Premium About Reddit Advertise Blog Careers Press. ... Go to canon r/canon • by Appropriate-Year-505. EF 70-200mm F/4 non IS vs EFs 55-250mm IS STM . How significant is the difference? A used 70-200 will be around 500€, the 55-250 can be had for as low as 200€. Are the differences really worth the 300 ...

WebEF 100-400 II vs. RF 100-500. I recently picked up an R6 Mark ii and I’ve been trying to decide which lens to buy out of these two. I’m going to be using these primarily for wildlife, which I don’t have much experience with, but I’ve heard so many different opinions about which lens is better. WebRF vs EF 24-70 2.8. I just ordered the R6. And now am looking into a buying a 24-70 2.8. I’m in debate with myself about the following choice. The RF 24-70 or the EF 24-70 ii. The second one is regularly available as second hand and gives room for another second hand lens. But the built quality of je RF is way better.

WebThe RF 24-105 f4 is larger and heavier, but optically superior, aside from the constant f4 maximum aperture. It is weather sealed and has both a control and focus ring. The RF 24-105 f4-7.1 is small and light and forms a very small fullframe package combined with the RP. The tradeoffs of the f4-7.1 are:

WebWhat’s the quality difference like between the new RF lenses and the old EF lenses? Will clients likely notice the difference? 0 comments 50% Upvoted Log in or sign up to leave a comment Log In Sign Up Sort by: best no comments yet Be the first to share what you think! More posts from the canon community 291 Posted by u/ImaHazardtoSociety sharp card reader mmc/sdWebRF lenses have to be placed much closer to the sensor than EF, so if you have a mirrorless RF body you can adapt EF lenses to it, but there's no way to do this in reverse (you'd have to somehow jam the lenses almost an extra inch into your camera.) 3 kickstand • 21 days ago EF or EF-S lenses only. Not RF, not EF-M, not the old Canon FD. 2 sharpcare grossmontWebEF 70-200mm f/4 vs RF 70-200mm f/4. I've been looking into getting a 70-200mm type lens for my EOS RP. If money was no object I'd probably go with the RF versions since it seems to have some slight advantages but I found some great deals that made me question whether the EF might be the way to go. The RF F/4 goes for around 1250 euros while I ... sharpcare eastlakeWebNo loss in image quality or autofocus performance, at all, when using a basic EF-to-EF-M or EF-to-RF adapter. All a basic adapter does is push the lens out to be the correct distance from the sensor in order to properly focus the light, and extend the electrical contacts out so that the body can communicate with the lens. sharp carbon filterWeb4. FantasticGlass • 7 mo. ago. The L series RF glass handles CA and flaring better and is a bit sharper wide open. But compared to the most modern EF glass it's actually pretty close. The biggest difference I noticed was CA, the RF L glass has basically none. It's impressive. sharp card type / card readerWebNov 23, 2024 · Specifically the 24-70mm ($600 more for RF), and the 70-200mm ($800 more). If you have existing EF lenses, I would run with those for now. I have three EF … pork allergy rashWebJan 11, 2016 · The RF 70-200/2.8 is my favourite major-change lens. To me, the size and weight difference over the EF is very real, and well-worth the telescoping action. Probably the RF70-200/4 is a huge improvement in usability too, but I've never shot with it. I like it even better than the RF100-500 vs the EF100-400. ••• sharpcap 設定